User guide to arte povera in 4 works

Focus - -

While the Pop art movement was having great success, a group of italien artists embarked on an entirely different intellectual journey… arte povera or “poor” art. In their refusal to conceive artworks as products, these artists put into place new artistic practices that would inspire conceptual art. More of an “attitude” than an art movement so to speak, arte povera aims to defy the cultural industry by creating artworks with “poor” materials, that have been rid of whatever trace of mass consumption culture. A look into this radical school of though through 4 emblematic artworks.

  • Step 1 : Use short-lived materials

The most visible characteristic of arte povera consists in the use of said “poor” materials : natural or recycled and wholly perishable. Sand, salt, coffee, plants, animals, tar, rope, coal, cotton – plants, animals and minerals in short – become a new matter from which to compose temporary pieces of art, that evolve with time.

Giovanni Anselmo – The structure that eats, 1968

Giovanni Anselmo – The structure that eats, 1968

This work revolves around the contrast between the blocks of granit, that resist the trial of time, and the lettuce, a symbol of vitality and perishable element. In order to maintain the fragile balance between the two, it is necessary to change the lettuce which makes the original sculpture totally temporary.

  • Step 2 : Create in an artisanal if not archaic manner

To have a simple and thus true relationship to these materials, the artists must not elaborate but rather present them in the most evident way possible. The question no longer is to construct a scene nor to interpret reality but to really identify with it. From an external point of view, this desire to use artisanal techniques results in pieces with quite direct composition. This does not exclude the use of technological material like neons, as long as they enable the audience and artist to identify with reality.

Giuseppe Penone – Soffio 6, 1978

Giuseppe Penone – Soffio 6, 1978

To make this sculpture, Penone left his imprint in terracotta, putting forth techniques and materials as old as man… This vase is part of a 6-piece series that aims to explore the relationship of the sculptor to his work.

  • Step 3 : “Live in art” in taking out of museums and galleries

Instead of “making art”, the point is to live it such as the frontier between art and everyday life disappears. The goal here is that the audience approaches the art object as he would its components in everyday life. Arte povera devotees namely created some of their artworks in natural spaces, much like did those of the Land art movement that was taking shape at the same time.

Michelangelo Pistoletto – Venus of the rags, 1967

Michelangelo Pistoletto – Venus of the rags, 1967

A pile of more or less dirty clothing and a copy of Venus : Pistoletto uses one of the most common objects of the everyday, clothing, coupled with an object that symbolizes ancien art and in fine, art, to make us think about the 2. Thus, in confronting these 2 elements, he manages to erase whatever limit between art and everyday life.

  • Step 4 : Bring forward the creative process rather than the object itself

The art object is no longer sacred : more attention is paid to what surrounds it and the artist’s thought process. The quality of the work is not a preoccupation anymore, allowing for art to be redefined with a new function.

Luciano Fabro – Floor tautology, 1967

Luciano Fabro – Floor tautology, 1967

The creative process of this artwork, that is to clean and polish a part of the floor to then cover it with newspaper left to dry, is much more important than the final result. Here, Fabro’s objective is to elevate an everyday action, furthermore a housework action, to the rank of fine art.

In its ambitious and revolutionary mission to change the nature of art, arte povera put into question more than a handful of as much aesthetic as functional considerations concerning the artistic object. Arte povera works of art are still harshly criticized by some that see it as intellectual patter… However, this so called poor art is worth gold to its many successors !

 

Share this post:

Leave a comment